02-23-2010, 01:55 PM
02-23-2010, 01:55 PM
BlakeTheFarmer Wrote:Someone post a pic!!!
NSFW
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.vg.no/sport/ol/2010/artikkel.php?artid=589446">http://www.vg.no/sport/ol/2010/artikkel ... tid=589446</a><!-- m -->
02-23-2010, 01:57 PM
edoblin Wrote:Chip Wrote:edoblin Wrote:FYI... You can't watch the best parts on Sportscenter... If you notice, they only have photos of the olympics... No video.
Haha, that's awesome.
Makes their whole argument pointless.
Yeah, I think the reason for that is because almost everything is shown on delay... so they don't want it on sportscenter if there's a chance it hasn't even aired on NBC yet.
I think there was an issue with that on NBC stations on the west coast. One channel (NBC maybe) was going to show something on tape delay, and another channel (MSNBC I think) was giving live updates. So people who were flipping around got some spoilers.
02-23-2010, 01:58 PM
BlakeTheFarmer Wrote:Someone post a pic!!!
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.vg.no/sport/ol/2010/artikkel.php?artid=589446">http://www.vg.no/sport/ol/2010/artikkel ... tid=589446</a><!-- m -->
02-23-2010, 01:59 PM
edoblin Wrote:Hasn't this whole "paying for facebook" thing shown to be a rumor? Haven't they come out and said they won't charge.
It is people just won't let the rumor die.
02-23-2010, 02:00 PM
CloveMan3 Wrote:I just found the Rosetta Stone language-module that Covino is studying...
:roflmao: :roflmao:
02-23-2010, 02:01 PM
LeNeve Wrote:BlakeTheFarmer Wrote:Someone post a pic!!!
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.vg.no/sport/ol/2010/artikkel.php?artid=589446">http://www.vg.no/sport/ol/2010/artikkel ... tid=589446</a><!-- m -->
I would.
02-23-2010, 02:03 PM
Chip Wrote:LeNeve Wrote:BlakeTheFarmer Wrote:Someone post a pic!!!
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.vg.no/sport/ol/2010/artikkel.php?artid=589446">http://www.vg.no/sport/ol/2010/artikkel ... tid=589446</a><!-- m -->
I would.
YA :hitit:
02-23-2010, 02:05 PM
this is funny:
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://pleaserobme.com/">http://pleaserobme.com/</a><!-- m -->
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://pleaserobme.com/">http://pleaserobme.com/</a><!-- m -->
02-23-2010, 02:08 PM
I would NEVER pay for FB
02-23-2010, 02:11 PM
Iva13 Wrote:I would NEVER pay for FB
Me neither.
02-23-2010, 02:11 PM
Tuesday = Covino is Right Day!!!!!!!!!!!!
02-23-2010, 02:11 PM
This is a moot point they are making... Facebook isn't going to charge. Let's move onto something else.
02-23-2010, 02:12 PM
SOMEONE PLEASE CALL IN AND TELL THEM THIS IS ALL JUST A SCAM!!! READ THIS:
The 'We Will Not Pay for Facebook' Scam
Back in December, a group protesting Facebook and the company's rumored plans to charge users $4.99 a month, amassed well over 100,000 members. Of course, it was a giant scam; Facebook had no such agenda, and the group merely served to distribute links to a site that loaded up visiting PCs with malware. Two months later, the scam is back, this time claiming that Facebook plans to charge $3.99. And it's been even more successful. The three groups perpetrating the hoax have collected roughly 340,000 gullible Facebook users, and the number is still climbing.
A Facebook spokesperson denied even the possibility of such plans to the Telegraph, saying, "We have no plans to charge users for Facebook's basic services. Facebook is a free service..." That's a pretty clear statement, so why does this rumor seem so reluctant to die?
The 'We Will Not Pay for Facebook' Scam
Back in December, a group protesting Facebook and the company's rumored plans to charge users $4.99 a month, amassed well over 100,000 members. Of course, it was a giant scam; Facebook had no such agenda, and the group merely served to distribute links to a site that loaded up visiting PCs with malware. Two months later, the scam is back, this time claiming that Facebook plans to charge $3.99. And it's been even more successful. The three groups perpetrating the hoax have collected roughly 340,000 gullible Facebook users, and the number is still climbing.
A Facebook spokesperson denied even the possibility of such plans to the Telegraph, saying, "We have no plans to charge users for Facebook's basic services. Facebook is a free service..." That's a pretty clear statement, so why does this rumor seem so reluctant to die?
02-23-2010, 02:13 PM
BlakeTheFarmer Wrote:Someone post a pic!!!heres a pic of the Curling chick