Poll: Should there be a License to reproduce?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
No
20.00%
2 20.00%
Yes
30.00%
3 30.00%
Well DUUH!
10.00%
1 10.00%
not only no but hell no!
0%
0 0%
the government shouldn't have a say
40.00%
4 40.00%
Total 10 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
License to Conceive
#16
This is a topic I don't really know what side I am on, so I thought I would toss it up to you guys because for some odd reason you guys make some killer points (in between ball bustings), and it is sort of a spin off of the license to conceive debate.

A few years ago a minor splash in the news was made by the parents who named their kid after nazi figure heads (Adolf Hitler, is one of their sons names).

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.myfoxphoenix.com/dpp/news/national/baby-hitler-case-ncx-11222011">http://www.myfoxphoenix.com/dpp/news/na ... x-11222011</a><!-- m -->

Aside from the violence towards the kids (just remove that from equation because), is this a free speech issue?

Normally I am 100% on side of free speech & expression except I am drawing a pause here because they have made it an issue for their child. If they had changed their own names to hitler- I would be ok with that, and just dismiss them as ignorant. But now they have created a problem for their child in 1) they are probably going to be raised ignorant and 2) have applied the name associated with evil to them without their consent.
Reply
#17
Rydrum Wrote:This is a topic I don't really know what side I am on, so I thought I would toss it up to you guys because for some odd reason you guys make some killer points (in between ball bustings), and it is sort of a spin off of the license to conceive debate.

A few years ago a minor splash in the news was made by the parents who named their kid after nazi figure heads (Adolf Hitler, is one of their sons names).

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.myfoxphoenix.com/dpp/news/national/baby-hitler-case-ncx-11222011">http://www.myfoxphoenix.com/dpp/news/na ... x-11222011</a><!-- m -->

Aside from the violence towards the kids (just remove that from equation because), is this a free speech issue?

Normally I am 100% on side of free speech & expression except I am drawing a pause here because they have made it an issue for their child. If they had changed their own names to hitler- I would be ok with that, and just dismiss them as ignorant. But now they have created a problem for their child in 1) they are probably going to be raised ignorant and 2) have applied the name associated with evil to them without their consent.

I think they must be sick individuals to names there kids after monsters. It's a tough line to cross. Yes, we have the right to name our kids whatever we want, but to push the envelope and name your child something like that is just a cry for attention. I'm torn whether taking them away from their parents was a tad extreme or not, but I thought I had read that the kids weren't being abused that just their names were raising the concerns.
Just because someone can call me Mom now doesn't mean I am gonna be Betty Freakin Cocker and bake any pies.
Beckster is the new Dexter
I HATE PIE!!
Reply
#18
Over-reach of government authority if you ask me. Would I monitor these dolts? Yeah. Take away all their kids over it? No way man.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)