Poll: Should there be a License to reproduce?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
No
20.00%
2 20.00%
Yes
30.00%
3 30.00%
Well DUUH!
10.00%
1 10.00%
not only no but hell no!
0%
0 0%
the government shouldn't have a say
40.00%
4 40.00%
Total 10 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
License to Conceive
#16
This is a topic I don't really know what side I am on, so I thought I would toss it up to you guys because for some odd reason you guys make some killer points (in between ball bustings), and it is sort of a spin off of the license to conceive debate.

A few years ago a minor splash in the news was made by the parents who named their kid after nazi figure heads (Adolf Hitler, is one of their sons names).

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.myfoxphoenix.com/dpp/news/national/baby-hitler-case-ncx-11222011">http://www.myfoxphoenix.com/dpp/news/na ... x-11222011</a><!-- m -->

Aside from the violence towards the kids (just remove that from equation because), is this a free speech issue?

Normally I am 100% on side of free speech & expression except I am drawing a pause here because they have made it an issue for their child. If they had changed their own names to hitler- I would be ok with that, and just dismiss them as ignorant. But now they have created a problem for their child in 1) they are probably going to be raised ignorant and 2) have applied the name associated with evil to them without their consent.
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)