+- Dudebro Nation (https://dudebronation.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Sports (https://dudebronation.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=12)
+--- Forum: Hockey (https://dudebronation.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=13)
+--- Thread: 2011-2012 Season (/showthread.php?tid=2041)
Re: 2011-2012 Season - Chip - 11-30-2011
Joe Wrote:Hockey threads are the most boring thing on the internet.
Na, they're one step up from forum wars.
Re: 2011-2012 Season - Joe - 11-30-2011
Forum wars are sweet
Re: 2011-2012 Season - Chip - 11-30-2011
Joe Wrote:Forum wars are sweet
They will be, as soon as T shows her tits because of them.
2011-2012 Season - i bleed green - 12-01-2011
Chip Wrote:I think it is extremely disrespectful that you keep asking to see T's boobs. Don't you agree Tina? You need to show these clowns what you think, by PMing only me a picture. That'll teach em.Joe Wrote:Forum wars are sweet
They will be, as soon as T shows her tits because of them.
Re: 2011-2012 Season - Chip - 12-02-2011
i bleed green Wrote:Chip Wrote:I think it is extremely disrespectful that you keep asking to see T's boobs. Don't you agree Tina? You need to show these clowns what you think, by PMing only me a picture. That'll teach em.Joe Wrote:Forum wars are sweet
They will be, as soon as T shows her tits because of them.
If you get them, and don't share them, you'll be branded a traitor to all guys.
2011-2012 Season - i bleed green - 12-03-2011
Chip Wrote:Now she's gonna know, and won't send them. :dumbass:i bleed green Wrote:Chip Wrote:I think it is extremely disrespectful that you keep asking to see T's boobs. Don't you agree Tina? You need to show these clowns what you think, by PMing only me a picture. That'll teach em.Joe Wrote:Forum wars are sweet
They will be, as soon as T shows her tits because of them.
If you get them, and don't share them, you'll be branded a traitor to all guys.
Re: 2011-2012 Season - Chip - 12-06-2011
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=382065
Conference A
Anaheim
Calgary
Colorado
Edmonton
Los Angeles
Phoenix
San Jose
Vancouver
Conference B
Chicago
Columbus
Dallas
Detroit
Minnesota
Nashville
St. Louis
Winnipeg
Conference C
Boston
Buffalo
Florida
Montreal
Ottawa
Tampa Bay
Toronto
Conference D
Carolina
New Jersey
NY Islanders
NY Rangers
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh
Washington
The proposed new conferences would be arranged to accommodate both geographic proximity as well as established rivalries.
Anyone else think it's a little weird that the NHL based these conferences based on geography, but then put Toronto, Ottawa and Buffalo in the same conference as Tampa and Florida? While there is an entire conference of teams in between them.
Or maybe there's just some big rivalries that I don't know about.
Re: 2011-2012 Season - Chip - 12-06-2011
But, the playoff system is exactly what they should have done.
Re: 2011-2012 Season - Pete Nice - 12-06-2011
Chip Wrote:But, the playoff system is exactly what they should have done.
Really? You like the top 4 from each division? Let's see how much you like it when Philly finishes with 95 points in 5th place and Toronto gets in with 82 points in the 4th place slot in their league.
Re: 2011-2012 Season - Chip - 12-06-2011
Pete Nice Wrote:Chip Wrote:But, the playoff system is exactly what they should have done.
Really? You like the top 4 from each division? Let's see how much you like it when Philly finishes with 95 points in 5th place and Toronto gets in with 82 points in the 4th place slot in their league.
I do like it.
I think it'll be rare that there will be that big of a difference.
The majority of the games will be in your conference, so one conference won't be able to rack up all the points, they'll have to split them.
And it ensures that the first 2 rounds of the playoffs will against your conference/division.
Re: 2011-2012 Season - Pete Nice - 12-06-2011
Chip Wrote:Pete Nice Wrote:Chip Wrote:But, the playoff system is exactly what they should have done.
Really? You like the top 4 from each division? Let's see how much you like it when Philly finishes with 95 points in 5th place and Toronto gets in with 82 points in the 4th place slot in their league.
I do like it.
I think it'll be rare that there will be that big of a difference.
The majority of the games will be in your conference, so one conference won't be able to rack up all the points, they'll have to split them.
And it ensures that the first 2 rounds of the playoffs will against your conference/division.
Well I don't like it at all. I want to play the Flyers or Capitals in the Eastern Finals, not the first round. I think the new divisions suck and the new playoff format suck and Gary Bettman sucks the most of all. He makes the NHL worse.
I don't understand why he couldn't leave things well enough alone and just move a few teams here and there to make the geographic changes. They could have made everything fine with maybe 4 or 5 moves max. Fuck Bettman, asshole.
Re: 2011-2012 Season - Pete Nice - 12-06-2011
And again Chip, I will wait and see how you feel when the Flyers get left out for a team with less points.
Re: 2011-2012 Season - Chip - 12-06-2011
Pete Nice Wrote:And again Chip, I will wait and see how you feel when the Flyers get left out for a team with less points.
Flyers are always going to win that division, so it won't be a big deal... :poke:
You could make the case that a team in the other conference now could make the playoffs with fewer points the way it is now.
Instead of 15 teams having that possibility, it's up to 22 or 23 teams.
Bettman is an ass, and a piece of shit. But he's only doing what the owners want him to do.
We're going to get to go through this all again next year when the Coyotes move to Quebec.
Re: 2011-2012 Season - Chip - 12-06-2011
Sure, Philly might get screwed once in a while, but I'm looking forward to this.
I think it'll make it more exciting.
You could end up with a Boston/Philly or Boston/NY Cup final.
I just think it'll get rivals playing eachother in the playoffs more often.
Re: 2011-2012 Season - Pete Nice - 12-06-2011
Chip Wrote:Pete Nice Wrote:And again Chip, I will wait and see how you feel when the Flyers get left out for a team with less points.
Flyers are always going to win that division, so it won't be a big deal... :poke:
You could make the case that a team in the other conference now could make the playoffs with fewer points the way it is now.
Instead of 15 teams having that possibility, it's up to 22 or 23 teams.
Bettman is an ass, and a piece of shit. But he's only doing what the owners want him to do.
We're going to get to go through this all again next year when the Coyotes move to Quebec.
There is no way someone could win a division now and have less points than the 8 seed, no way at all. I like the current playoff system, the best teams should be in the playoffs. In fact, I have always said the change they should make is seeding by points not division winners. 1-8 based on points, division winner or not. THAT truly rewards you for doing good. THAT is how it should be. I am telling you, there are going to be teams in the Pens/Flyers division every year with more points than at least one or two teams that make the playoffs. My money is on the Flyers and Rangers being one of them within the first few years.